Free Updates

Let us tell you when new posts are added!

Email:

Navigation

Categories

Search

Archives

<February 2009>
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
25262728293031
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
1234567

More Links








# Tuesday, February 10, 2009
What's the difference between tobacco and gum?
Posted by T.S.

Tobacky.jpg
   And now, after that brief interruption for my apology about A-Rod’s steroid use, we return to our regularly scheduled programming, which was essentially a discussion about that 100-year-old news article from the Charlotte Observer entitled “The Small Boy’s Mania.”

   If ever there were a news story that neatly described what the baseball card hobby is all about, this was it. While baseball fans often have difficulty connecting to the turn-of-the-century ballplayer, this account of youngsters hovering around the local drugstore to wade through packs of cigarettes in search of Ty Cobb, Honus Wagner and Christy Mathewson makes it clear the distinction between young collectors in 1909 and 1959 is nominal at best.

   The article describes “flipping” of the pictures, though that particular verb isn’t employed; more intriguing is the paragraph alluding to Cobb and Wagner:

   “More especially are the likenesses of Ty Cobb and Hans Wagner desired, and until a week ago only a few pictures of Cob (sic) had been found, two of these in the possession of the Buford Hotel cigar stand.”

   It went on to detail arrivals of shipments at area drugstores, noting that “13 pictures of Cobb were found in the first installment opened.” The story also noted that one store sold 3,000 cigarettes and that by day’s end, 5-cent packages of smokes were selling for as little as a penny apiece, sans pictures, of course.

   The article made no mention of any Wagners being found, and if you take into account these scenarios of prepubescent boys wrasslin’ with 5-cent cigarette packages, it’s easy to see what Honus had been worried about all along ... assuming you buy the mythology.




Tuesday, February 10, 2009 2:40:34 PM (GMT Standard Time, UTC+00:00)  #  Comments [0]
# Monday, February 09, 2009
My screw-up on A-Rod was nicely timed ...
Posted by T.S.

A.RODRIGUEZ.jpeg 
   Part II of the 1909 T206 White Border card frenzy will have to wait. Weekend news developments related to Alex Rodriguez and steroids have bumped the cute little hosers from my blog for at least a day.

   And no, I am not going to overload the already-past-the-fire-department-limit “Scold A-Rod” bandwagon by climbing on board. Nope, I resort instead to self-flagellation. For a self-described cynic, in fact someone who considers himself way too cynical for his own good, I appear to not be uniformly jaded. There are gaps, it seems.

   We just sent the book Legendary Yankee Stadium: Memories and Memorabilia From the House That Ruth Built off to the printers in anticipation of a May release, and it carries the following tidbit by yours truly in Chapter 12:

   It is fascinating to note that despite the steroid and human growth hormone revelations that occurred after 2004, Rodriguez escaped largely unscathed despite his spectacular production.
Stadium1.jpg
   Ouch! For those wondering, once a book heads off to the printer, making changes becomes a pretty big issue, and therefor doesn’t happen unless it’s something truly extraordinary. Being way too naive and having bad timing doesn’t qualify, so those jarring words are about to be immortalized in print.

   In hindsight, I should have reread some of things I wrote earlier in that A-Rod chapter, which had I examined them more closely might have prompted me to avoid the clean bill of health offered by that ill-fated paragraph.

   For example: Rodriguez has managed to do something that no ballplayer has ever done before: his numbers are too good, too other worldly, too imposing – so much so that they’ve propelled him to a spot that is awash with the cruelest of contradictions. He’s so good that nobody seems to truly appreciate how good he is. Is that like Yogi’s apocryphal restaurant that’s so busy that no one goes there anymore?

   And just to show you that I’m still embracing my cycnical side, I’ll be the first to admit that I’ve used this flap over A-Rod and steroids as a shameless opportunity to plug the book.

   And it almost certainly won’t be the last.





Monday, February 09, 2009 3:26:46 PM (GMT Standard Time, UTC+00:00)  #  Comments [0]
# Friday, February 06, 2009
The hell with the cigarettes, where is Honus? ...
Posted by T.S.

cigpostcard.jpg   Scot Reader, a well-known name to SCD readers and serious tobacco card collectors, came up with one of the coolest news clips I’ve ever seen. The 100-year-old news article from the Charlotte Observer is entitled “The Small Boy’s Mania,” with subheads reading “Pictures of ‘Baseball Men’ More Sought After Than Gold,” and “The Small Boy’s Greatest Desire is to Secure Pictures of Ty Cobb and Hans Wagner.”

   I used to get a kick out of reading old newspapers, which might have nearly a half-dozen headlines detailing important details of the story, and this particular story makes it clear how that style of journalism would have carried such currency in those days.

   Reader, who authored one of the great reference features in recent years in our pages of Sports Collectors Digest: The Monster: A Collector’s Guide to T206,” deserves kudos for finding this ancient news piece, which offers a wonderful view into the earliest days of collecting by young boys eager to cast aside the smokes in favor of pictures of their favorites.

   Second paragraph: “Since the beginning of summer when the American Tobacco Company commenced putting the pictures in their packages of cigarettes, the small boy has been more or less of a nuisance by stopping young and old men as they walked along the street begging for “baseball men.”

   It detailed how the collections had become a mania, adding that whenever a new shipment of cigarettes is opened, the boys besiege those around the “stand” trying to get the pictures from them. At no point in the article are the T206s referred to as cards; they are pictures.

   Fourth paragraph: “Saturday a frying-sized kid purchased $1 worth of cigarettes, and after securing the desired pictures, peddaled the smokeables to the passers on the streets. Often two packages of cigarettes were offered for 5 cents, but the pictures had always been extracted.”

   Hell, that’s wonderful stuff and I’m not even sure what a “frying-sized kid” is. This is such an intriguing story, I am going to stretch it out a bit and come back with Part II on Monday.




Friday, February 06, 2009 9:05:35 PM (GMT Standard Time, UTC+00:00)  #  Comments [0]
# Thursday, February 05, 2009
The Topps Vault is cyber heaven ...
Posted by T.S.

Camp59.jpg    As I suspect many readers understand, this business of blogging is a learning process for me, which has resulted in my spending more and more time in the mysterious world of cyberspace, bouncing about from one website to another trying to acclimate myself to something that doesn’t remotely come easily.

   As you might suspect, there are more misses than hits, but I suppose if you can bat .300 or so you’ve done just fine, or if you hit the occasional triple or home run, it’s even better. If you’ve never poked your nose into the Topps Vault (www.theToppsvault.com), I’d urge you to do so, even if it means stopping at the local library to take advantage of their Internet capabilities. (The original photograph from the famed 1959 Topps Symbol of Courage Roy Campanella card is shown at right)

   See, I understand there are readers who don’t have the Internet, an observation that I suppose is a bit goofy when blogged like this to people who presumably do have it. Still, I transfer many of these blogs to the pages of my column in SCD, so the recommendation isn’t nearly as silly as it sounds.
Vault61.jpg
   As the photos here suggest, for the old geezers like me who love SCD and a half century of hobby history, the stuff in the vault is as cool as it gets. Currently, they are offering Topps Archival File Copy trading cards and pages from the binders that Woody Gelman & Co. used to create an historical record of their creations.

   Some of those album pages with two or three cards pasted in to show both the fronts and backs were sold in the famous 1989 Guernsey’s Topps Auction, but hundreds of others were retained in the files. I can’t tell you how much fun it is to go the site and see some of the pages that are currently available (1961 Topps Baseball as I blog this) or the many that have been auctioned on eBay over the past year-plus.

   The website notes: “The Topps team also inserted many of its original file copy cards onto special die-cut pages. These striking cards are free of any staining and present themselves in high-quality condition. The stain-free cards are encapsulated two ways, either as “Authentic” or with an actual BVG numerical grade, i.e. BVG 8. The Topps team archived only one of each stain-free card into the presentation binder and this rarity is identified on the label as 1/1.”

   For many years, Topps used to face criticism, largely justified, for being way to “present focused,” a byproduct of an understandable company mantra that they were creating a product aimed at youngsters. Just as it’s difficult for me to make a transition from a printed-page philosophy to something that accounts for all the confusing stuff that occurs in cyberspace, Topps officials have for many years now understood the adult-orientation to so many of their products – old and new – and adjusted accordingly.

   We both starting to get it.

P.S. Happy 75th birthday, Mr. Aaron.






Thursday, February 05, 2009 4:36:33 PM (GMT Standard Time, UTC+00:00)  #  Comments [1]
# Wednesday, February 04, 2009
When I left the Big O cooling his heels ...
Posted by T.S.

BigOscar.JPG
   Nearly four decades ago, it was more of a novelty for the average sports fan to run into their heroes in public, certainly nothing like today when the dramatic escalation of autograph values has made a big business out of something once reserved for genuine fanatics.

   In 1970, I spotted Oscar Robertson and Bob Dandridge walking along Market Street in San Francisco, and I sort off stalked them for a few blocks without ever pestering them for an autograph or anything else. I was in my Navy uniform, which I mention merely by way of explaining why I was in San Francisco.

   I was a huge Robertson fan, having followed him even since his final days in college, and he was the first hall of famer from any sport that I ever encountered – such as it was – in person. I would have recognized “The Big O” easily anywhere, but it didn’t hurt that the two NBA stars were decked out in duds whose price tag I suspect exceeded my entire net worth at that moment.

   Fast forward a dozen years to Buffalo, N.Y., where Robertson was the featured speaker to open the Empire State Games that year. Games Director Mike Abernethy knew that I was a big Robertson fan, so he asked me if I wanted to pick him up at the hotel and bring him to the Games’ headquarters before the opening ceremonies. It was a rhetorical question.

   I was thrilled to have that opportunity, but in the frantic hours leading up to the 2 p.m. appointment, lots of things went haywire at the press center, which was my responsibility as PR coordinator. Pulled in every direction by reporters, staffers and volunteers, I was running around frantically when I happened to notice the time. It was 2:25 p.m!

   I typically disdain exclamation points, but it’s appropriate here. I was distraught, thinking that I had bungled such an important task and quite possibly pissed off the most important dignitary at that year’s Games. I raced over to his hotel not far from the University of Buffalo-Amherst campus where we held the opening ceremonies and most of the competition.

   There he was standing out front, looking now even more distinguished, possibly now several C-Notes or more on the hoof, adjusted for more than a decade’s worth of inflation (which we had a lot of in the 1970s).

   He jumped into the New York State government vehicle and listened patiently while I apologized as profusely and abjectly as I ever have for anything in my life. He waved all of it away, telling me not to worry about it.

   Though it wouldn’t have seemed possible, I became an even bigger Oscar Robertson fan after that one.

   And I never asked him for an autograph!





Wednesday, February 04, 2009 4:02:05 PM (GMT Standard Time, UTC+00:00)  #  Comments [0]
# Tuesday, February 03, 2009
Will unemployed fans find empathy for Manny? ...
Posted by T.S.

mannyramirez.jpg  
   Baseball’s middle-class roots have been threatened for decades, almost literally since the arrival of free agency 34 years ago, but fortunately, the hold the game of baseball has on the American psyche is so profound that even the numbskulls who run the game haven’t been able to destroy it. But God knows they’ve tried, though I am willing to concede probably inadvertently.
 
   But the absence of intent hardly gets them off the hook for having stood in the owner’s box and watched as the best game on Earth gets battered from every direction.

   That ponderous introduction results from hearing news that Manny Ramirez has politely declined the Dodgers’ offer of $25 million for the exalted privilege of having him take another season of swings at Chavez Ravine.

   In normal times, that would be little more than another annoying bit of nonsense from the singularly narcissistic modern athlete, but these are hardly normal times. One of the zillions of reasons that old-timers are so beloved by older fans is that many of them used to spend their winters working a wide variety of odd jobs in order to make ends meet. We could relate to them on a personal level.

   Of course, that means they were sorely underpaid back then, just as many are perhaps obscenely overpaid now. But of course, that’s a subjective judgment. (Original artwork of Manny Ramirez by acclaimed artist Paul Madden; www.maddenart.com)

   The responsibility for doing all that overpaying lies with the owners, who have been hornswoggled by the union at virtually every juncture for more than 30 years.

   It’s kind of interesting to ponder how fans will react in 2009 to a player turning up his nose at a paltry $25 million, especially in a time when millions represent chump change. These days, we talk hundreds of billions, and don’t hardly blink.

   And I assume just about everybody who reads this knows someone – a family member or a friend – who’s lost his/her job over the last year. And for those who haven’t lost their job, they’ve watched helplessly as a hapless government and malevolent band of thieves on Wall Street teamed up to threaten the present and the future all in one fell swoop of greed and insanity.

   I’m not even mad at the man-child Manny, who I guess shouldn’t be crucified for merely being Manny. He’s been elevated to heroic status and paid handsomely for all of his adult life for doing all the stuff he has done precisely as he has done it.

   I have a bit less sympathy for his agent, Scott Boras, who may have finally botched what otherwise should have been a routine grounder to first.

   We’ve got to figure out an acceptable way to “boo” the actual people who deserve to get booed.




Tuesday, February 03, 2009 3:53:05 PM (GMT Standard Time, UTC+00:00)  #  Comments [0]
# Monday, February 02, 2009
Vintage card experts are urged to give me a call ...
Posted by T.S.

Vintage54cover.jpg
   We’ve undertaken a pretty ambitious editorial project this year at Sports Collectors Digest in trying to bring more stories about vintage cards and sets to our incredibly loyal readership, along with the planned 12-part Mickey Mantle Collectibles Series, an Industry Spotlight feature and a Hobby Royalty special section.

   The focus on vintage card sets is planned for every other week, and is already under way with a feature on 1954 Topps Baseball in the Feb. 13 issue; the Mickey Mantle Collectibles Guide mega-series started in the Feb. 6 issue, and Part II, looking at Yoo-Hoo Beverage Co. items and pieces from two tours of Japan that the Yankees participated in in the 1950s, is slated for next week’s issue (March 6).

   I don’t often use this space to trumpet editorial plans, but the expanded scope of our effort in 2009 leads me to solicit whatever help I can get. It’s a lot of fun writing about vintage sets, but I have no illusions that I am the ultimate authority on any of them.

   I have long understood that there are literally hundreds and hundreds of experts out there connected with virtually every set or individual ballplayer imaginable. The trick is finding them and enlisting whatever help they might like to offer.

   So here’s a peek at the schedule in coming months, and if your area of expertise is touched upon and you’d like to contribute, let me know. The idea is that I’d love you to tell me something I don’t know about the 1975 Topps Baseball issue, which is this week’s offering (sorry about the short notice).

   For those who’d like a little more lead time, installments on the 1959 Topps Football, 1957 Topps Baseball,  1962 Fleer Basketball and 1972 Topps Baseball are coming up (roughly in that order, every two weeks). The fact that I’ve put all those sets together card-by-card hardly makes me an expert; it merely makes me a fan.

   As my old homeroom teacher used to say, “You know who you are.” And I would, too.




Monday, February 02, 2009 5:41:14 PM (GMT Standard Time, UTC+00:00)  #  Comments [1]
# Friday, January 30, 2009
A first, jarring glimpse of the nature of racism ...
Posted by T.S.

Altman85.jpg

   Ronnie Joyner, the wonderful artist who supplies pen-and-ink drawings of legendary ballplayers every week for us in the pages of SCD, turned in a drawing of George Altman (shown here – it ran in the Feb. 20 issue of SCD), a National League slugger in the late 1950s and early 1960s that I remember from when I was a kid.

   Now, George Altman was a pretty fair country ballplayer in those days, and one of the stars of the Cubs when he was an All-Star in 1961 and 1962, back when the Cubs were merely inept and not quite as beloved as they are now.

   Anyway, I was at some kind of a family function and I am going to say it was at the time of the first All-Star Game in 1961 at Candlestick Park in San Francisco, since that was where Altman socked a home run. The men and the older boys, of which I was one, were gathered around the TV for the game. In truth, I am not sure it was that game; for purposes of this recollection, it hardly matters whether it was 1961 or 1962 or even which game it was (that was when MLB was stretching credulity with two per season).

   Altman stepped up to the plate, and one of the older men in the large group huddled around the black-and-white TV said matter of factly something to the effect of: “That’s the blackest nigger I’ve ever seen.”

   I was kind of startled, since my parents had pretty effectively instilled in me a sense of just how reprehensible such a remark was, but it was a moment of prepubescent cognitive dissonance, since there was no discernible reaction from any of the adults that he had said something wrong.

   Who the man was isn’t important; he wasn’t a family member, and he's long since gone, but he was a highly respected and admired member of that group and in his community. It would be many, many years before I understood the significance of what I had heard, which was essentially that the evils of racism extend far beyond the obvious instances of numbskulls wearing bedsheets and prattling about vicious nonsense.

   Indeed, I suspect many blacks might tell us that one of the things that makes racism so insidious is that it held so many otherwise fine human beings within its tawdry embrace.

   As the election of 2008 illustrated, that embrace is growing weaker every day, but it’s a pretty good bet that it’s still there. The encouraging news is that such a remark would be so much rarer today than it was 50 years ago.

   It’s just too bad that that’s the way I remember George Altman. Or maybe not.

P.S. – In case anyone is inclined to scold me, I used the actual offensive term quite intentionally, rather than the widely utilized euphemism “N-word,” which I regard as a pretty silly alternative. While I understand the revulsion that the actual word arouses, I won’t typically join in the widespread usage of the toothless “N-word.” That man back in 1961 didn’t say “N-word,” he said something far more disturbing and hurtful than that and I am not disposed to infantilize the historical record.




Friday, January 30, 2009 11:03:40 PM (GMT Standard Time, UTC+00:00)  #  Comments [0]
# Thursday, January 29, 2009
The curious hobby attachment to the statuesque ...
Posted by T.S.

nomar 1.jpg

   I vaguely remember the first time I saw a Hartland Statue, probably around 1960 or so at a small variety store in northern Wisconsin where my family would spend a week every summer.

   The store had creaky wooden floorboards and elaborate, glass-encased display cases for much of the inventory, and there they were, safely tucked away in those boxes that nowadays can be even more valuable than some of the statues.

   But they were $2 apiece, and that was enough to scare me away, since it represented two months’ allowance. Even though I was mildly intrigued, it was not to be, since the very same store had 1960 Topps Seventh Series. I was a card kid before I was a card guy.

   Our hobby has always had a kind of uneasy relationship with all things of a non-cardboard nature. By the time the hobby took off in the 1980s, the Hartlands were already highly valued by collectors – and they still are today – but the business of making and marketing statues to the hobby has taken curious turns over that span.

   Gartlan Statues made a serious hobby splash in the early 1980s with attractive cereamic statues that also included autographs; the Hartlands were “reprinted,” for lack of a better term; something called Starting Lineups came along – and since went away; and the most significant development of all took place when McFarlane (Nomar statue shown here) arrived and turned the whole business on its ear.

   Those statues aren’t $2 at retail locations, but they might as well be. Selling for anywhere from $6 to $15 or so – more for some of the cleverly contrived variations – the highly realistic and detailed statues represent a bigger bargain than $2 ever did in 1960.

   They may not be as handy to store as a set of 700 cards that can fit into one binder, but it’s hard to think of too many modern “collectibles” that have come along in recent years that measure up to these remarkable pieces.

   The best thing about them may be that the amazingly low prices allows youngsters to treat them as playthings while at the same time get an affordable introduction to the collecting bug. That ought to be applauded by anybody who supports our hobby.




Thursday, January 29, 2009 5:01:30 PM (GMT Standard Time, UTC+00:00)  #  Comments [0]
# Wednesday, January 28, 2009
Bidding John Updike (and Teddy Ballgame) adieu ...
Posted by T.S.

1955_BowTed.jpg
   I got a phone call the other day from a man who said he had worked with Ted Williams more than 50 years ago when Ted has his own fishing tackle company, still several years before he sold it to Sears-Roebuck in 1962.

   This call came at the same time as the national news reporting of the death of Pulitzer Prize-winning author John Updike, whose essay in the New Yorker in October of 1960 chronicled Ted’s poetic ending to his career with a home run in his final at bat.
1960_ToppsAS.jpg
   The man with the fishing film from 1958, reportedly two 16mm films, including a portion of one section narrated by Red Barber, was interested in finding out if anybody was interested in buying them, and I wasn’t sure what to recommend. The films had been used at personal appearances by The Thumper, and the man thought that the two reels were one-of-a-kind pieces.

   Best thing I could think to do was to put it in my blog and see if it attracted attention from some direction. Done.

   The passing of Updike made me think of that New Yorker essay, which probably marks me as a philistine when it comes to literature, but so be it. I remain a big Ted Williams fan and still am deeply saddened that the goofy way his remains were handled (ie. frozen) after his death in 2002 has done a great disservice to his exalted memory.

   But then there’s the Updike piece to ease the pain a bit:

   “Like a feather caught in a vortex, Williams ran around the square of bases at the center of our beseeching screaming. He ran as he always ran out home runs — hurriedly, unsmiling, head down, as if our praise were a storm of rain to get out of. He didn’t tip his cap. Though we thumped, wept, and chanted ‘We want Ted’ for minutes after he hid in the dugout, he did not come back. Our noise for some seconds passed beyond excitement into a kind of immense open anguish, a wailing, a cry to be saved. But immortality is nontransferable. The papers said that the other players, and even the umpires on the field, begged him to come out and acknowledge us in some way, but he never had and did not now. Gods do not answer letters.”


The wonderful baseball-almanace website has the whole essay posted:
Click here:

   There are a host of reasons why I like blogging about Ted, but one of the best is that it gives me the opportunity to show some of Keith Conforti’s amazing Ted cards “That Never Were.” Teddy was an MIA from several classic Topps sets, but his fans have filled those holes nicely over the years, often with ersatz pasteboards that wound up being better than a lot of originals.





Wednesday, January 28, 2009 4:25:45 PM (GMT Standard Time, UTC+00:00)  #  Comments [1]