Free Updates

Let us tell you when new posts are added!

Email:

Navigation

Categories

Search

Archives

<April 2007>
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
25262728293031
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
293012345

More Links










 Monday, April 02, 2007
Too much boo hoo about Barry
Posted by T.S.


   As readers of my column in SCD are no doubt aware, I am the self-appointed world’s greatest Henry Aaron fan, an informal designation that speaks to nothing more than my unrelenting ardor and half-century-plus of serious campaigning on his behalf. I offer that as a disclaimer ... and as evidence that what I am about to write warrants a bit of extra credibility since it defies conventional wisdom and comes from someone who generally writes with a pronounced pro-Aaron slant.
  
   People discussing the approaching demise of Henry’s All-time Home Run King status need to lighten up and simply accept the moment with whatever degree of disdain, disbelief, disgust, disinterest, disregard or elation that seems appropriate for them personally.
BONDS1.jpg
   What prompted this was an editorial in the largest newspaper in our state (Milwaukee Journal Sentinel) noting that the editorial “they” would be placing an asterisk after Barry Bonds’ name if and when he passes Hank’s No. 755. This solemn edict stems from Bonds’ alleged link to steroids.

   Aside from the obvious silliness of individual newspapers deciding which Major League Baseball records they will ratify and which they will deem unworthy, you are confronted with the unworkability of the whole idea. If you look hard enough, you can find any number of reasons to question the validity of records; we just put extra import on this Bonds situation due to “drugs,” because we are at war with them and have been for more than 40 years.

   In fairness to the Journal Sentinel guys (non-gender-specific usage), I suspect they weren’t that serious or really literally intend to follow through with the asterisk part. Roger Maris didn’t really get one, either.

   There is also much debate about what Bug Selig’s role should be in marking the occasion of the record being toppled, a faux controversy that winds up being mindless fodder for sportswriters.

   Of course Selig has to try to be present when the record falls, and I emphasize “try” because it’s an inexact science and the commissioner of baseball can’t be expected to hang around the ballpark like a groupie for a couple of weeks in the event that Bonds doesn’t sock No. 756 in his usual one homer every 11 at bats or whatever.

   With that caveat included, how could Selig not make an attempt to attend? Why would he want to feed the controversy surrrounding his beloved game by seemingly turning up his nose as the most important record in baseball history falls? It’s a no-brainer.

*  *  *  *  *  *

   When is a Hall of Famer not a Hall of Famer? Or more precisely, when is a non-Hall of Famer actually a Hall of Famer? Pete Rose would be an example of the former: a player with the visibility and perhaps popularity of a Hall of Famer (including card prices), though he may never actually have the official designation.

   Marvin Miller would be the preeminent example of the latter. Both legends are appearing at MAB Celebrity’s April 28-29 show in Secaucus, N.J., with both signing that Sunday afternoon. Miller got rudely dissed by the HOF’s Veterans Committee in late February in a vote that defies understanding as much as it begs for a change in the way the voting is done.

   It says here that Miller will ultimately be in the Hall of Fame, one way or another. There’s too much credibility for the organization itself at stake in the process for him not to eventually be enshrined. Miller is 90 years old, so the debate about whether he’ll be around to enjoy sitting in one of those rocking chairs on the front porch of the Hotel Otesaga is legitimate, but there shouldn’t be any real argument about his eventually getting a plaque.

   It may not be on par with William Gladstone’s quotation about “Justice delayed is justice denied,” but it seems particularly unfair to me for someone to be excluded from enjoying the ultimate recognition of a life’s work simply because the process of according that recognition is clumsy and inefficient.

   Dick Gordon (full disclosure: a friend for more than 20 years) is bringing Miller to that MAB show (www.mabcelebrity.com), and like so many of us, he was thoroughly disappointed and disheartened by the HOF voting results announced on Feb. 27. Miller is appearing at a show with a dozen Hall of Famers, another eventual shoo-in (Ken Griffey), a player who should be a HOFer someday (Andre Dawson), a whole bunch of rookies of the year, and Pete.

*  *  *  *  *  *

   I bet it would make an interesting poll to ask fans whose facsimile autograph was on the very first baseball glove that they owned when they were young. For me it was Moose Skowron on a Denkert glove, but it turns out that the whole idea of attaching the ersatz autograph of your favorite player to a store-model glove is apparently in decline, having lost favor for a number of reasons over the last two decades or so.

   Our own Joe Phillips, SCD columnist and the editor of The Glove Collector, the online (www.glovecollector.com) and printed newsletter, was quoted in the New York Times Sunday Sunday edition on April 1 in article entitled “Gloves Without Names.”

   Citing Phillips, the article noted that in the late 1970s about 70 percent of store-model gloves came with the facsimile autograph; now, the figure is closer to 80 percent without a signature.

   Apparently the combination of increased licensing fees, declining demand and changes in the way gloves are wholesaled around the country came together to spell the demise of the once iconic product. The example noted in the article was a youngster in New England coming upon an Alex Rodriguez model glove at the local sporting goods store, giving our hypothetical Beantowner simply another reason not to buy the glove.

   The executive quoted, Tom DeSimone, a buyer for Modell’s, did point out that his best-selling glove is actually a “relatively inexpensive $29.99 Derek Jeter model intended for children under 12.”
I wonder how many adults end up buying that particular item as something to be used to get a real Derek Jeter signature on it?

*  *  *  *  *  *

   Speaking of player endorsements, probably the most famous instance of that coming up as an issue would be the T206 Honus Wagner card. While the folks outside the hobby often ascribe the scarcity of the Wagner card to an alleged distaste for tobacco products that Honus was said to have had (contradicted somewhat by his 1948 Leaf card), hobby veterans often put stock in yet another view.

   The seemingly more sophisticated take on the T206 rarity is that Honus objected to not be properly compensated for using his image, since he was arguably the brightest star in the baseball universe at the time.

   Either way, the T206 Wagner has been one of the most widely reprinted cards in hobby history. The result of that is, of course, that we get on average a handful of phone calls every year with the excited fan clutching a T206 Wagner in one paw while breathlessly asking me about its value.

   I routinely ask the collector to turn to the card’s back and read me what it says. “This card is one of the most coveted in the sports card hobby, selling for as much as $80,000,” is roughly what they end up telling me in reading from the back of the “card.” And then I have to gently explain that the $80,000 figure is a fairly conspicuous hint about the authenticity of the pasteboard.

   I am not sure (I could ask noted autograph expert Mike Gutierrez), but I have a suspicion that it’s a lot more fun to be the guy on the PBS television show “Antiques RoadShow” telling some unsuspecting collector that is memorabilia is worth a kazillion dollars more than he/she thought, rather than being the guy who ended up bursting their bubble.





4/2/2007 3:40:42 PM (Eastern Daylight Time, UTC-04:00)  #  Comments [6]
 Monday, March 26, 2007
Into the Blogosphere
Posted by T.S.

    This is my blog. I am a 56-year-old formerly computer-phobic weenie who now finds himself quite unceremoniously propelled into cyberspace. I am the editor of Sports Collectors Digest; I have been here at SCD for nearly 14 years and worked for several years before that as a freelancer. I would still have the original Topps cards that I bought as a 9-year-old in 1959, since I politely asked my mother not to throw them away while I was overseas in the Navy from 1968-72, but I have upgraded most of them over time. If that sounds like I am – at some bizarre level – ashamed of ts1.jpghaving done so, then there it is.

   I am not so much a reluctant cyberspace traveler as I am a bit intimidated by the undertaking. That’s odd, since I trace my computer roots back to 1969 when I operated a UNIVAC 1004 computer at the Naval Communications Center at Subic Bay in the Philippines. That particular contraption was roughly the size of old Crosley Field; as the computer age rolled on through nearly four decades, the actual hardware kept getting smaller and smaller, as did my comfort level with each new advancing generation.

   I whine like this because I welcome any help that loyal readers can provide in terms of pushing me in this or that direction, with this or that nuance or emphasis. Remember, I was the guy who thought Pong was breathtaking in 1975 with its graphic sophistication and frenetic pace.

   So with that convoluted introduction, here I go. I will be updating this periodically, as they say, so hopefully there will be good reason to revisit from time to time. Five, four, three, two, one ...

 * * * * *

   One of the main reasons I love going to shows, aside from seeing old friends and great cards and collectibles, are the reminders that I get from those very same friends and collectibles about why our hobby has such an enormous underlying strength and resilience.

   For many years when I would get treasured opportunities to visit with famed collector Barry Halper, I would come away from virtually every meeting with an overwhelming admiration for his scholarly interest in the game of baseball and its history, rather than an overriding preoccupation with investment value or other such details concerning dollars and cents.

   Naysayers might pooh pooh all that, saying, with some sarcasm, something to the effect of, “Yeah, and he wound up with nearly $40 million for all his scholarly pursuits.” True enough, but I can promise you that when you talked with Halper about his stuff (which will be the kind of exchanges I’ll be featuring in this blog), it wasn’t about what he paid or what he could get for something: it was about the item and its history, and no detail was spared.

   Anyway, when I was at the Chicago Sun-Times Show over the St. Patrick’s Day Weekend, I ran into a host of old friends – just as I usually do at George Johnson’s biannual show, our own SportsFest show, the Philly shows and other major East Coast events (read auctions) and at the National Convention.

   And speaking of the National Convention, I briefly saw John Broggi, National Convention co-manager, who was there in his official capacity to check out details for the 2008 National. I also ran into one of my favorite people in the hobby, Steve Juskewycz, president of Megacards, the company that produced the wonderful Conlon Collection cards from 1991-95. Juskewycz is a standout golfer; he was buying autographs from another friend, Kip Ingle, who is regarded as one of the top sources in the hobby for golf items.

   On Saturday at the show – St. Patrick’s Day – I was walking around in a garish, bright-green jacket, a bit of sartorial splendor mildly out of character for somebody who dresses in the dark and thinks that “dressing up” means finding a T-shirt that doesn’t have any advertising logos on it.

   Anyway, the jacket was loud enough to prompt Mounted ts2.jpgMemories president Mitch Adelstein to ask if I had won the Masters, but it also elicited a wave from another friend, autograph expert/dealer Phil Marks from New Jersey.

   “Who’s the second-most-famous Irishman in Chicago,” he asked. I was pretty sure I wasn’t it. “Charlie Comiskey,” Marks said, and he proceeded to produce a great pile of artifacts, including photographs and postcards, from the Hall of Famer’s estate.

   He had items from a 1907 spring training trip by the White Sox to Mexico City, a number of stunning Indian postcards from Comiskey’s travels out west, and even PC’s from the 1924 World Tour. And the whole time I was talking to Phil about the Comiskey cards (listening, really), he never once mentioned the price of anything. Not that he doesn’t sell stuff, just that he has that estimable Halper-like quality of being so genuinely interested in his own material that the monetary aspect isn’t the overriding focus.

   I was also personally interested in four or five images from Comiskey’s summer home in Eagle River, Wis., the place where he died in 1930. My grandmother had owned a “cottage” in nearby Three Lakes, Wis., where we vacationed nearly every year until 1960 or so, and my cousins still own the summer home now, though calling it a cottage would be akin to calling an aircraft carrier a boat. It’s one of the most beautiful areas in the state, if a bit forbidding in the winter, unless you’re a snowmobiler or skier.

   And on the subject of that neon-green sport coat, I wanted to point out that I had actually been given the jacket the night before from my mother. My father, who died 11 years ago, was as natty a dresser as I am, uh, less than fashionable. I had stopped to see my mother in Stoughton, Wis., en route to Chicago for the show, and the only remarkable thing about her giving me his boisterous green jacket was the mystery of why she had waited more than a decade to do it.

                                                             * * * * *

   Fathers and sons; that’s big-time stuff. It’s still fun when old-time collectors remember my dad from the early 1980s and the days of O’Connell & Son Ink. Lots of people still recall that quirky little outfit we started in 1982, though not that many actually remember meeting my dad, except for a few dealers in Indiana who met him when we first started selling the Baseball Greats set in 1983.

   Around that time I was the director of public relations for the Empire State Games in New York, the prototype of virtually every state-sponsored “State Games” in the country, and I still have a staff jacket from that time, now all of 25 years old. I was wearing the jacket the other day when it occurred to me that it was a bit on the snug side.

   As I sort of wondered why I hadn’t sent it to Goodwill or otherwise retired it, it reminded of a remembrance of my father when I was a kid and I was always wondering why in casual situations on Saturdays (like Connie Mack, he always wore a suit and tie to work), mostly, he would wear things that often seemed to be too small. And with the green jacket fresh in my mind, I suddenly realized that now I was doing the same kind of thing. We attach a lot of sentimental power to some garments, a power that keeps them in the closet long past the point when traditional notions of utility and/or style might have relegated them to the dumpster.

   Keeping my Navy uniforms would be an obvious one, but I’ve still got a custom-made shirt from the Philippines, circa 1969. It’s the only custom-made shirt I’ve ever owned, and unlike my Navy dress blues or dress whites, I am pretty sure I can still fit into it.

   At age 56, finding more evidence that I either already am or am continuing to become my father is hardly stunning, but it’s comforting in a spiritual sense. Heck, I’ve got his driver’s license and other such ephemera since his passing, and I could easily use it in some official capacity, if needed, since we have the same name. And for those youngsters who think this is a lot of maudlin claptrap, I can only remind you that you, too, are becoming your father. It's just a matter of time.

* * * * *

   Barry Bonds, he of considerable fame in his own right but also the son of a famous father, is nowhere to be found in the first couple of Topps sets this year, after a two-year run as an exclusive with the iconic card company.

   I gotta admit I might not have noticed this, except that I took a lot of interest in the 2007 Heritage issue which came out a couple of weeks ago. As readers of my column in Sports Collectors Digest probably know, I am a big fan of these Heritage issues, so it’s a lot of fun when we open up the sample boxes that we receive here. I am also a fan of the idea of intermittent reinforcement, a notion that collides with the card companies’ modern emphasis on creating contrived scarcity.

   There was something to be said about the way they did it in the old days, but of course, that relied to a great deal on the idea of printing cards in six or seven series every summer. If you opened packs of 1959 Topps, you would get (in theory, anyway) as many Mickey Mantles as you would Coot Veals. There was/is a good deal of power to the intermittent reinforcement concept; I don’t know if B.F. Skinner had baseball cards in mind with his revolutionary study in 1957 (is it just coincidence that this was the first year of the standard, 21/2-by-31/2-inch Topps card?), but I am convinced the application is completely relevant for collectors.

   Being the online whiz that I am (facetious), I noted somewhere online that somebody likened the underlying principles of IR to the often seemingly addictive quality of e-mails and slot machines. I’ll confess to a substantial hankering for the latter; with the former, I have a bit more of a conflicted relationship.

   I guess there’s irony in Barry Bonds’ absence from a baseball card issue prompting all this fuss and investigation, but he is the biggest star in the game, if not the most popular player in the game. In the spirit of this blogging business, I would note that Bonds has a good relationship with Topps, based on my understanding of the two years when he was exclusive with the company, so I wouldn’t be surprised if Topps eventually brought him back into the fold. I’ve never heard any rumblings to suggest that “His Barryness” might be inclined to exercise his egalitarian side and sign with the MLBPA; turns out his report card says he doesn’t play well with others.

   One last thing in the Topps department: As I waddle around cyberspace both in my official capacity as editor of SCD and in preparation for this blogging venture, I wound up on a message board on the Collectors Universe website. There I found some of the original photos that were used on vintage Topps cards, including Willie Mays from 1952 Topps (and the image used for the painting in 1953), the background of several 1956 Topps cards, including Mantle, Nellie Fox and Monte Irvin, and a couple of others. It’s the kind of stuff I love, so here’s the link, as they say: CU Forum




3/26/2007 3:15:56 PM (Eastern Daylight Time, UTC-04:00)  #  Comments [16]
 Friday, March 23, 2007
Test #2
Posted by T.S.

This is a test.  This is a test hyperlink.



3/23/2007 2:55:42 PM (Eastern Daylight Time, UTC-04:00)  #  Comments [6]